Comprehensive medicolegal services, built for plaintiff counsel.
Every engagement is handled by a licensed physician with dedicated medicolegal focus—not a part-time consultant splitting attention between clinic and casework.
Case experience spanning the full spectrum of plaintiff medical malpractice—obstetrics and labor & delivery, general surgery, emergency medicine, delayed cancer diagnosis, orthopedics, ENT, internal medicine, and beyond. The pattern recognition that comes from years of high-volume plaintiff-side screening means knowing what to look for in any specialty, and knowing what it means when you find it.
Rapid medical record review to assess liability and causation potential before significant resources are committed. Clear go / no-go assessment with supporting clinical rationale and case rating. Includes identification of the operative clinical practice guideline and the version in effect on the date of the alleged negligence, where one applies. Flat fee: $1,200—delivered within 48–72 hours of completed record receipt, depending on volume.
Identification of missing, incomplete, or critical records not yet obtained—and why they matter to the case. Knowing what isn't in the file is often as important as knowing what is. Delivered with specific recommendations for which records to pursue and where to find them.
In-depth physician review of records, imaging, labs, and clinical documentation to identify deviations from accepted standards and establish causation chains.
Physician-organized chronological summaries of treatment, providers, and clinical events—structured for use in pleadings, depositions, mediation, and trial preparation.
Comprehensive written medical opinion—causation analysis, standard-of-care conclusions, and provider-level findings—suitable for demand letters, pleadings, and expert disclosure. Includes a physician assessment of which providers and medical issues are most likely to require deposition testimony, giving counsel a clinical roadmap for discovery planning.
Physician-drafted prose narratives telling the medical story of what happened—causation narratives, injury descriptions, and treatment summaries for use in petitions, demand letters, and discovery responses.
Physician-drafted interrogatories and document requests targeting defendant clinical conduct—records, policies, credentialing, and decisions a physician knows to ask for. Includes medical substance for responses to defense discovery on causation and standard of care.
Physician-authored preparation materials for deposing medical witnesses—clinically grounded question frameworks, anticipated answers, and impeachment roadmaps built directly from the records.
Clinical identification and organization of key medical witnesses and records—who matters, why they matter, and how the medical evidence fits together for deposition and trial.
Clinical timeline graphics, anatomical illustrations, and visual exhibits that translate complex medical findings into clear, jury-ready demonstratives for mediation and trial.
Access to an established national network of physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses built over years of plaintiff-side medicolegal work. We identify, vet, and connect counsel with qualified experts suited to the specific clinical and jurisdictional demands of the case.
Medical records arrive throughout litigation—in waves, from multiple sources, at unpredictable intervals. As new records arrive through discovery, supplemental production, ongoing treatment, or defense disclosure, the initial analysis needs to keep pace. We cross-reference new records against prior review, identify what is genuinely new, flag what changed and why it matters, and update the report accordingly. Available hourly throughout the litigation lifecycle.
Physician-led case analysis, end to end.
From rapid case screening to deposition preparation and expert witness sourcing—every engagement is handled by a licensed physician with dedicated medicolegal focus. The methodology below explains why AI alone is not enough.
We don't just read records.
We interrogate them.
Most medicolegal reviews tell you what happened. Ours tells you why it happened, which providers the records implicate, and what the defense is likely to argue. Advanced analytical tools allow us to move through large record sets quickly and surface patterns that linear review misses—but every finding is interpreted by a physician with the clinical and medicolegal experience to know what it means, whether it holds up, and where the holes are.
Unverified AI output fabricates citations, misreads records, and produces opinions that a single deposition question can destroy. Raw AI tools used in litigation have produced exactly this failure.
Every record set is reviewed the way a physician reads a chart—not passively, but with active questions, pattern recognition, and nowhere for an inconsistency to hide. Every finding is verified against the source before it reaches you.
Faster turnaround than traditional review. More thorough analysis than either AI or physician review alone. Opinions that survive deposition—because they were built to.